Is it necessary to inherit a certain aversion towards the boring. Can't be the worst thing a person can ever be, can it? Since when Hollywood was ever boring in the first place, what with the condors enjoying their wind, and the Bale being so profane.

Doing a task, I take the risk of being slightly foolish and delve in to bring the emotions of others and me, with a certain level of rationality. Properly done it is not, spawning reverence it sometimes does. It is those moments when you see to whether you have risen to the occassion. You either decide to take the easy way out, which means you're gonna disappoint yourself and everybody else. Or take that risk of being the fool, the fool whom everyone notices and is given a damn.

Perhaps Bale is the easy way out, for I perceive myself familiar towards his work. And there is so much more than just the bat in the man. You then get tied to the fact that you know an artiste so well to their very depths of their work and craft that it becomes predictable. So much credit and esteem are lost once you know the author too well, somehow lessens their prolific anonymity. That does not mean I have reasons to believe that I've disappointed myself, but to others and some people of significance might have.

Perhaps Bale can become my tool to be a fool, and I still have hopes for that. I can be diverse, I can be unpredictable. I can be dual, I can be layered. I can be honest, I can be contradictive. Brutal, I might, but nonetheless I can. All this will naturally be in the dark, and unfold in due time. That keeps things enjoyable and yes, unpredictable. Flaws will always be in attendence, for it is just so overused as an answer to the search of excuse. But that endless fascination to enthrall will perpetually drive me. After all, it's not who I am underneath, but what I do that defines me.

And you're telling me it's a quote from Batman. Backside, that wasn't the fool I wanted to be.